(A History of Philosophy) PDF DOWNLOAD ô Frederick Charles Copleston
Ryone he discussed and present
them fairly and then criticize them in a respectful way In this book he lets fairly and then criticize them in a respectful way In this book he lets opinions overrule this especially with Sartre whom he obviously has a great dislike for To begin with Sartre here seems out of place to come from out of nowhere because Copleston has excluded most secular philosophers after the classical positivists and the Marxist tradition entirely he considers Marxism to be a nineteenth century philosophy which would be forgotten if it hadn t been articially adopted by the Communist parties as an official line rather ironic for a Thomist who supports a thirteenth century philosophy artifically kept alive by having been adopted as the official line of the Catholic Church I would guess there are far Marxists outside the Communist parties than Thomists outside the Catholic Church He refers to Sartre s dialectical arguments freuently with expressions such as tiresome jargon I might se the same expression for the jargon of the Transcendental Absolute and so forth in the writers he discusses earlierNow that I have finished to sum The Rhetoric of Reaction up the whole history the first volume was fairly weak and I would recommend another history for Greek philosophy eg Guthrie s the second through seventh volumes and especially those on the Middle Ages are probably the best general history in English if you correct for the Catholic bias not extremely apparent except in the choice of whom to focus on and the fact that they are roughly a half century old the eighth and ninth volumes are as described in this review and I would recommend other books for the twentieth century actually I m not sure a general history is the best way to approach contemporary thought anyway. Er and showing his links to those who went before and to those who came after him The result of Copleston's prodigious labors is a history of philosophy that isnlikely ever to be surpassed Thought magazine summed The Ghost Light Kids Get Hooked up the general agreement among scholars and students alike when it reviewed Copleston's A History of Philosophy as broad minded and objective comprehensive and scholarlynified and well proportioned We cannot recommend it too highly. Perfect Finally done all nine
volumes highly recommended Now back to Thomas Finally finished after three and a half years highly recommended Now back to Thomas Finally finished after three and a half years forty three if you count the first time I started it in college This was the ninth and last volume He mentions a projected tenth volume in #the preface but apparently never wrote it the tenth volume included in one reprint edition is an nrelated collection # preface but apparently never wrote it the tenth volume included in one reprint edition is an nrelated collection his essays Like the eighth volume this one is a real falling off from the level of the first seven as he explains himself in the preface faced with the large number of nineteenth and early twentieth century philosophers and with administrative responsibilities taking p much of his time he decided to concentrate on the thinkers he was already familiar with which obviously meant a concentration on Catholic or religious philosophers and writers who are not the authors I would consider to be representative of the British v 8 or French v 9 philosophy of the time I hadn t even heard of many of the authors he treats of in these two volumes despite having been a philosophy major in college Moreover many of the writers he discusses are not generally considered as philosophers at all but as literary religious scientific or political figures and where the earlier volumes concentrate on a few major figures with general chapters in between in this one apart from Comte Bergson and Sartre no one gets their own chapter
And There Are Many there are many who are treated in a few paragraphsThe book begins well in the first part From the Revolution to Auguste Comte with the aftermath of the French revolution the Traditionalists and the Ideologues and then moves on to Maine de Biran there is a chapter on the Eclectics Royer Co. Conceived originally as a serious presentation of the development of philosophy for Catholic seminary students Frederick Copleston's nine volume A History Of Philosophy has journeyed far beyond the modest purpose of its author to niversal acclaim as the best history of philosophy in EnglishCopleston an Oxford Jesuit of immense erudition who once tangled with A J Ayer in a fabled debate about the existence of God and the possibility of met.
Frederick Charles Copleston ↠ 9 DownloadLlard Cousins and Jouffroy one on Social Philosopy ie the topian socialists Fourier Proudhon and the most space given to St Simon who however is still not covered adeuately and a chapter on
COMTE THE SECOND PART FROM AUGUSTE COMTE TO HENRIThe second part From Auguste Comte to Henri and the beginning of the third part From Bergson to Sartre or than a third of the book however is given mainly to the spiritualist tradition Philosophy and Christian Apologetics and Thomism in France apart from Bergson and Maritain these chapters were all about writers I hadn t heard of and despite Copleston in his element here trying to differentiate their minute differences about God and theology and determine how close they are to Catholic orthodoxy they all seemed pretty much to be saying the same things trying to se Maine de Biran andor German Idealism to reconcile God and Christian metaphysics with a positivist conception of science There is then a fairly interesting chapter on Philosophy of Science including Poincar Duhem Meyerson and Bachelard followed by two chapters on basically Catholic writers including Teilhard de Chardin and Gabriel Marcel he ends The Messy Accident (An ABDL Story) up with two chapters on Sartre and a last chapter on Camus and Merleau Ponty with a few concluding paragraphs on Levi Strauss and structuralism In addition to theestion of his choice of subjects this book also was less objective the others in its treatment Although Copleston never pretended to be objective in the sense hiding his Catholic perspective and I preferred that in that a known and admitted bias is easier to correct for than a hidden one which is what is found with most objective accounts in a subject as controversial as philosophy he did try to It Looks Like This understand eve. Aphysics knew that seminary students were fed a woefully inadeuate diet of theses and proofs and that their familiarity with most of history's great thinkers was reduced to simplistic caricatures Copleston set out to redress the wrong by writing a complete history of Western philosophy one crackling with incident and intellectual excitement and one that gives full place to each thinker presenting his thought in a beautifully rounded mann.